It's seem there is some trouble with ranling list
for example i have some laps time on woodwalle and it says no time registred
pls look at it
tks coop amts Mic64

Please take a look at the basis of valuation.

EDIT:
Only currently [on Server 1] available vehicle types and tracks will be used for ranking.I am not sure, but maybe this is the problem here.

The ranking list is a overrated statistical spreadsheet anyway. The importance of the ranking list is mostly academical and not a true reflection of who is a consistingly fast and good simracer. We know who the really fast guys are and I am not one of them.
While it is very flattering to see your name up in #10, #3 or #1 on the ranking list, it actually means nothing ie. there's no real value to it with one exception. He who has over the years driven many 100's of thousands of km on the Altbierbude will in all likelyhood be fairly high up on the ranking list. Vehicles and tracks change all the time, so the ranking list can be seen as a very volatile indicator of a mechanism that is in constant flux.

That's true.

if you want to settle way up the list, take some cars nobody else drives often (TVR, Triumph, Jaguar, etc.) and do some laps with them. The competition is not nearly as high as with 911, Alfa, ETCC, etc....

Ron Zacapa wrote:
The ranking list is a overrated statistical spreadsheet anyway. The importance of the ranking list is mostly academical and not a true reflection of who is a consistingly fast and good simracer. We know who the really fast guys are and I am not one of them.
While it is very flattering to see your name up in #10, #3 or #1 on the ranking list, it actually means nothing ie. there's no real value to it with one exception. He who has over the years driven many 100's of thousands of km on the Altbierbude will in all likelyhood be fairly high up on the ranking list. Vehicles and tracks change all the time, so the ranking list can be seen as a very volatile indicator of a mechanism that is in constant flux.

I love it.

i agree with you Ron and Morhum.
Actually ranking list give point to only the first car. Why don't give point for the five or ten best car. like that it will oblige drivers to use many different car and not to be spécialised of less than 10 cars. Like that i am quite sure good drivers like manfred haupental will be alway on top of the list